At the book's center is the avowed American mission to spread democracy throughout the world.

This will be essential as a guide on how to spread democracy throughout the world.

The red states saw this and elected a president who would fight to spread democracy.

Most neoconservatives would say they believe in the use of American military force to spread democracy around the globe.

Is there some missionary sense in which the United States has an obligation to spread democracy throughout the world?

Unless we provide Iraq with good leadership, our plan to spread democracy, which looked so close to victory two years ago, will end in defeat.

Then it was going to spread (nonexistent) democracy throughout the Middle East.

Do we have the moral right to spread democracy?

"This will spread democracy through the Middle East, just like Bush said it would."

The European Union's role in the contemporary world should be to spread peace, democracy, and freedom across the globe.