That will happen only with testimony done in public, so the American people can watch and listen.

What is a jury meant to do with such testimony?

Jury selection began on March 19, 2012, with testimony beginning the next day.

The actual trials with testimony may not begin for months.

I do not recall saying anything like that in connection with her testimony.

And those who came forward with testimony today gave varying accounts of their experience.

"I had no problems with her testimony," said the juror, a man who asked not to be identified.

But I don't want to end with her testimony just in case she winds up taking a beating on cross.

It has to do with her earlier testimony, your honor.

Where could one begin with such testimony, since it had the earmarks of outside influence?