The main action in Canada is for oppression or unfair prejudice now.

When an in-state defendant is being sued in a state court, it is expected that he will not be subject to unfair prejudice.

The absence of unfair prejudice was not demonstrated.

"Threat or menace" is a popular phrase usually used in news headlines to satirize an unfair prejudice.

An employer who holds an unfair prejudice against women will always hire the man, given the requirement to pay both equally.

It also has an equivalent for unfair prejudice in CA 2001 s 232, which need not be discussed again.

Rule 403 allows the exclusion of relevant evidence on the grounds of "unfair prejudice."

Even after the evidence becomes relevant, I am concerned about the potential for unfair prejudice.

The Court of first instance therefore decided that there had been no unfair prejudice and that a share purchase order could not be made.

The Court took the view that because unfair prejudice had not been found, it would be inappropriate to make an order for the company's winding up.