The Administration's appeal argues that Judge Jackson mischaracterized the Line Item Veto Act as an unconstitutional delegation to the President of legislative authority.

Further, the court held that the Environmental Protection Agency's broad standard-setting authority did not amount to an unconstitutional delegation by Congress of legislative power to an executive branch agency.

Doing either of these things normally counts as an unconstitutional delegation of the legislative power of the state.

Thus, Yakus held that an administrative agency could "save" an otherwise unconstitutional delegation of power through a narrowing construction that constrains the agency's own discretion.

The majority of the Court ruled that if the state ratified Part III, it would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of the state's external sovereignty.

They ruled that were Ireland to ratify Part III it would amount to unconstitutional delegation of the state's external sovereignty.

Mr. Byrd said the judge had agreed with his view that the line item veto law was "an unconstitutional delegation of Congress's power over the purse."

The narrow issue was whether the joint resolution was an unconstitutional delegation of Congressional power to the President.

In particular in 1935, the Court unanimously ruled that the National Recovery Act (NRA) was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the president.

The police should not, the argument continued, be permitted to exercise discretionary power because it would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of authority and would, in any case, increase the possibilities of discrimination and corruption.