With this book, the theory of deliberative democracy continues to grow.

So the dinosaurs could in theory have continued to pile on genetic advantages.

Alexander's theory continued to be challenged as the years went on.

Counts' theories continue to draw support and criticism from modern educators.

Such theories continue to be popular in Russia to this day.

Though the early research has largely been dismissed, the theory of bonding continues to have an impact.

While both theories continue to produce findings, the debate continues to be discussed.

Despite this, the theory continues to receive support from some scholars.

A range of different outcomes has been proposed, and new theories continue to be put forward.

In that case-how would this new theory of his continue to stand up?