A good many serious scholars seem to be centering on the figure 20,000,000, but I consider even this too high.

However, most scholars seem to agree that the Dezhnyov story as we have it is basically correct.

Not until the 1920's did scholars seem to reach a consensus on what the khipu were.

Moderate scholars seem to support that view while recognizing the need for exceptions and limitations, such as the fair use doctrine.

However, not all scholars seem to agree.

Many scholars seem to hit upon the similarity of the dog's name to the Latin word for "horse".

Immediately after the colossal legal fight, lawyers and scholars seemed as worn out as everyone else.

Perhaps for that reason, Western scholars seem hardly to have studied the phenomenon.

Japanese scholars seem to be unable to agree upon the purported size and participants amongst themselves.

Not so long ago, scholars seemed close to agreement on when and how ancient people first colonized America.