He'd read it somewhere: In any ethical situation, the thing you want least to do is probably the right action.

Is there such a thing as an invariably right or wrong action?

There was some argument later about the right action for South at this point.

How do we know that's the right action for us?

Here are the various key thoughts that I use with pupils to try to produce the right action.

The Board of trustees took the right action to fire the whole bunch.

But there were then many views about the right action for South.

For example, many authors prefer to work with just the right action.

We are not taking the right action at the moment.

A right action seems to fill the eye, and to be related to all nature.