What it needs first and foremost is cooperation with Ukraine on reducing nuclear arms.

Moscow has shown itself willing to pay a high price in reducing offensive arms to slow the program down.

Moreover, this would be the very first agreement that significantly reduced offensive nuclear arms.

A vital treaty to reduce nuclear arms is stalled in parliament.

It is in America's interest to conclude deals to reduce nuclear and chemical arms.

Might an agreement to reduce conventional arms in Europe help them?

Given the difficulties of reducing arms or raising spending, Europe's best option lies in doing more with less.

So we must strive to reduce arms on both sides.

They are searching for agreement on reducing long-range, strategic nuclear arms.

And if conventional force cuts are delayed, does it make sense to hold up the Start treaty to reduce nuclear arms?