The suit also argues that because transit officials have authority to oversee the editorial content of the publication, the publication violates First Amendment rights to a free press.

Random House filed suit against RosettaBooks for copyright infringement, arguing the new publications violated its preexisting contracts to publish the novels "in book form."

Nevertheless, a California State appellate court ruled late last week that the publication of the letter didn't violate Moreno's privacy rights.

Last month, the endowment informed Movement Research that the publication violated its grant agreement.

A decision of a court that assumes that a publication is violating another person's personal rights (a newspaper for example can be forced not to publish private pictures).

A state prosecutor said the publication of the text had violated the press law, which prohibits publishing of secret documents.

The paper asked two simple questions: Would publication violate the law?

The three-judge appeals court panel ruled unanimously that such discussions were not covered by grand jury secrecy rules and their publication did not violate any laws.

But defense lawyers say pre-trial publication of such material violates the rights of their clients and taints potential jurors.

He claimed the publication violated both Georgia's shield law and his common-law right to privacy.