The protesters argue that they have never blocked traffic, thought they have spilled onto the streets from the beginning of the campaign.

Some protesters argued that as a part of a poor, overwhelmingly black part of Crown Heights, their neighborhood was easy fodder for budget wars.

The protesters argued that they had a 'lawful excuse' for what they did.

An anti-establishment protester in his youth, Dr. Piot now argues for maintaining good relations with pharmaceutical companies.

They and many protesters argue that the cuts will threaten the country's economic recovery.

Still, the protesters argued that the space was a public property, and that they had the right to use it freely.

Some protesters have argued that tax should be based on amounts other than the amount of money or the fair market value of property or services received.

The protesters argued that surveillance cameras in public places smacked of a police state.

No definitive studies have been done on the safety of gene-altered foods, and protesters argue that more research is needed.

Several protesters argued that even American diplomacy was wrong-headed because the administration refused to call the attacks a criminal act and, instead, considered them an act of war.