Proponents argue that the law will provide greater access to quality care at lower cost.

But proponents of action argue that valuable time would be lost.

Proponents of the law argued that it would bring families closer together at a critical time in a young woman's life.

Proponents of the ban argue that this has not changed.

Proponents, knowing they had the votes, did not argue the issues.

Some proponents argue that these values are better for all human societies.

The proponent argued that the terms were therefore not covered by s17.

Also, proponents argue that conviction politicians are more likely to win.

Proponents of the road argued that the environmental concerns were exaggerated.

At the same time, proponents also argue that texts should not be well above the participants intellectual level or too long to read.