Only one state, New Jersey, prohibits political contributions from gambling interests.

Is it rational to prohibit contributions by people who have passed this extremely strict test?

How, for example, are companies able to skirt a law that has prohibited corporate contributions to Federal candidates since 1907?

The Senate has voted, for example, to prohibit contributions from political action committees.

The Senate bill would prohibit contributions by action committees.

The law also prohibits contributions from corporations and labor unions.

This proposal would prohibit corporate contributions in city campaigns.

For example, the law limits the amount of money you may contribute and prohibits contributions from certain sources.

They also violated Federal laws that prohibit contributions from being made under the name of another individual.

State law prohibits indirect contributions of more than $1,000 to any campaign.