The second positive right in this context is that provided for by Article 11.

Another response to this argument would be that no one has a positive right to be saved.

Some have cited differences between 'positive rights' and personal freedoms.

A positive right is a right to be subjected to an action of another person or group.

You keep stating things in terms of positive rights, which doesn't fit.

On the other hand, positive or concrete rights that require resources for its realisation.

Hence, section 23 is a positive right requiring government action.

It was pretty positive right from the time we landed.

This is a rather negative approach, since it tells us nothing about any positive rights that citizens may have.

So on this side we actually believe in positive rights.