Where we think we're going to get political art, we start to see design.

They also organized free music concerts and works of political art.

More significant, perhaps, are the reservations critics have about political art.

If not intelligent, he was highly subtle in the practice of his political art.

Why bother making political art if you think it has no effect?

It remains true, however, that a directly political art is rarely successful.

This is political art too, but the opposite of critical.

Can it, or any other kind of political art, effect change?

They offered very different takes on what political art could mean.

Is lightening up the way to go in political art?