To prove a violation under the fifth definition, the plaintiff must show that section 17500 was violated.

But the judge said the question of whether the plaintiffs could show that there are very few alternative sites available was "of great significance."

Second, a plaintiff must show that the intended audience will recognize substantial similarities between the two works.

Such cases should be heard by a Federal judge only if plaintiffs can show that state courts would be prejudiced against them.

By comparison, Federal law requires plaintiffs to show that racism contributed to patterns of segregation.

The plaintiff, furthermore, had not shown that the breach was material.

More important, the plaintiff must show that the defendant had access to the original work.

Once a duty exists, the plaintiff must show that the defendant breached it.

In addition, it said, plaintiffs must show that Congress clearly intended to allow individuals to go to court to enforce the law.

The plaintiff must show that the duty was owed to him.