But Boot and Cohen disguise their policy advocacy as objective history.

It should by no means be taken as an "objective" history.

The Hebrew Bible writers were not writing objective history.

It offers the reader a soundly researched, authoritative, and objective Jewish history in one volume.

But now comes another distinctive feature of this book, which may make some readers yearn for a certain amount of external, "objective" history after all.

I don't think anyone will call this an objective history.

The first visit should include an objective history and a look at the total person, not just an isolated body part that is the current complaint.

Good historians agree that objective history is a myth.

He does so not by writing a retrospectively objective history.

An objective history of science is most effective to this aim.