The winner is the player with the greatest net wealth at the end.

The tax base is net wealth less a basic deduction.

Bonds should not be considered as part of net wealth at the macroeconomic level.

They'd mean the magazine covers, the net wealth and the ubiquity.

There are many lines of argument in favor of including a tax based on individual net wealth.

Forbes estimated his net wealth at $8.3 billion in 2010, making him the 42nd-wealthiest American.

Regardless of the share price our net wealth will be 400p which according to Eq.

There are 42 women on the Forbes 400 in 2010, with a combined net wealth of $154 billion.

In March 2013 his net wealth was estimated at $1 billion by Forbes.

His net wealth is almost as large as the Indian government's $44.3 billion in revenues last year.