In cases of this sort we are really passing a moral judgement upon the law.

Such a moral judgement in no way affects the law.

He always made moral judgements, taking the side of the underdog, no matter who it was.

If you're not passing moral judgement than what's the point in posting?

The answers to such questions make the moral judgement on my work as an architect.

I'm not making a moral judgement here, just a factual one.

In the end, it is a moral judgement made by the artist, the management, and the audience.

The problem here is again a moral judgement, dependent on what you mean by success.

How are those concerned with the law to ascertain society's moral judgements?

I think that of very little relevance to moral judgement.