From the perspective of lexical semantics, some people have argued that force dynamics fails to be explanatory.

Words may either be taken to denote things in the world or concepts, depending on the particular approach to lexical semantics.

I am particularly interested in lexical semantics, or how people access meaning through words.

However, they can be disentangled sufficiently to allow our study of lexical semantics to proceed.

However, there is a distinction that can be made within 'expected' status which is of some significance in lexical semantics.

It will be necessary to introduce a distinction, which has up to now not been needed, between two kinds of element relevant to lexical semantics.

It may be wondered why it is necessary, or even advantageous, to have two sorts of unit for lexical semantics.

Semantics as specifically involved in lexicological work is called lexical semantics.

Cognitive lexical semantics is thought to be most productive of the current approaches.

Complementary, a type of opposite in lexical semantics (sometimes called an antonym)