In all, this story features many more losers than winners, but justice, after a fashion, seems to have been done.

But justice seems conducted in a rather haphazard fashion, here.

In their comments, the justices seemed as divided as the rest of us.

It can deny abused citizens the very kind of accountability that democracy and justice seem to demand.

The justices seemed to struggle over whether to rule broadly or narrowly on the cases.

The justice, he said, seemed to hint that he could activate the cases.

But to Americans, local justice sometimes seems like an oxymoron.

Of all workers' complaints, the justice of those over truck seem to have been most widely acknowledged.

However, what I dont understand is that why justice seems to apply for only one set of people.

Some justices seem to use ideological criteria above and beyond the general criterion of excellence.