Worse, journalists, defending their minor infractions, trap themselves into justifying the greater censorship.

Other journalists who have worked in volatile areas defend the decision to film the hostages, but none condones any staging of events.

I've even heard American journalists defend the camps as legitimate educational institutions.

It is interesting how journalists are starting to see the writing on the wall and are defending their place tooth and nail.

Some journalists defend this suppression practice on the grounds that such sourcing issues are only of interest to other journalists, and not the general reader.

These journalists are not just defending working mothers - they're defending themselves!

Many journalists defend their interest, saying private behavior can reveal public character.

Many journalists and news executives defend their portrayals as accurate reflections of a city wrestling with extraordinary problems.

This will not end the charges of bias, but will allow journalists to defend what they do from a more realistic, less hypocritical position.

Unlike most of the other reporters, this principled journalist is risking her freedom and defending us all by fighting the subversive subpoena.