The interpretation and the methods of that study have been criticized, and the finding continues to be a matter of debate.

This interpretation has been criticized in more recent decades, especially the papal connection and Italian involvement.

Marx's interpretation has been the source of intense controversy, and has been criticized in different main ways:

Some Christian interpretations are criticized for reflecting specific doctrinal bias.

Rather, his interpretation has been criticized as a "conjectural reconstruction" from what appears during later, historical times.

But the interpretation of the revolutionary events based on this research has been already criticized and partially modified since the end of the 1970s.

This interpretation has been criticized by relativist scholars as unfounded and based on a lack of knowledge of Whorf's work.

Bernstein's premiere and subsequent interpretations were later widely criticized for taking extravagant liberties with the score.

Such interpretations have been criticized on the grounds that "all" is not a word that constitution-makers use lightly.

These interpretations of Christian origins have been criticized for "anachronistically projecting contemporary ideals back into the first century."