Therefore, the court found that P10 did not demonstrate its likelihood to succeed in a contributory infringement claim, and consequently denied injunctive relief.

Therefore, the court found P10 unlikely to succeed in a vicarious infringement claim, and consequently denied injunctive relief.

The court denied the infringement claim employing an analogy based on the Encyclopædia Britannica.

Newsletter publishers rely on rewards, often $2,000 or more, for information leading to a successful infringement claim.

In 2000, Infogear won an infringement claim against the owners of the iphones.com domain name.

Some site owners complied after such threats, but American law establishes parody as a fair use defense against such infringement claims.

This was the last step required before the regulations detailed in the law could be developed and the commission to review infringement claims established .

The judge granted it, allowing the vicarious infringement claim to go forward under a theory of indirect liability.

All the law requires to be immune from infringement claims is that the copying be done for private purposes.

A software distributor, for example, may seek provisions protecting its customers from infringement claims.