It is an old theme that this runs to an infinite regress unless some things are 'good in themselves'.

We are immediately involved in an infinite regress, which can have no meaning in the real universe.

Goldfarb had the sense not to get stuck in that infinite regress.

Also, when considering development, it must be stressed that we do not have to depend on an infinite regress.

However, as Bach shows, this leads to an infinite regress.

But it's got to be done carefully, or you risk having the machine fall into what is called an infinite regress.

There seems to be an infinite regress of sentences getting their meaning.

One of the main arguments against is that such levels of language can lead to an infinite regress.

However it also raises the question of where this universe came from, leading to an infinite regress.

Such a situation would lead to an infinite regress.