The main reason why the Italian government adhered to strict rules was the desire to avoid the possible negative effects associated with the industry.

In a pair of landmark decisions, the court made it clear that even during the war on terror, the government must adhere to the rule of law.

He promised that the new government would adhere to "a pluralistic vision, democratic, civil and ensuring the implementation of the law, the state of law."

Economists tend to the first position, but most governments, businesses, and environmental groups adhere to the second.

He added, however, that the government would adhere to the 1962 Constitution [see pp. 34767-68; 37549]guaranteeing democracy.

But he wrote that the federal government should adhere to his declaratory judgment as the functional equivalent of an injunction.

In making decisions about intellectual property law, governments should adhere to these rules:

Fire prevention in southern European countries should be encouraged through binding measures to which the governments of the Member States must strictly adhere.

The post 1999 government has broadly adhered to privatisation and market deregulation plans instituted by these funders.

In foreign affairs, the government adheres firmly to the traditional policy of accepting external aid but refusing entangling alliances.