It is considered the certification system of choice for small forest owners.

In the late 2000s, local forest owners started campaigning to remove the remaining tracks.

The removal would be at the cost of the forest owners.

Subsidies require forest owners to replant after the trees have been cut.

These forecasts have been made in association with the region's major forest owners.

His father was one of the largest forest owners in Telemark.

Of course, that raises the question why any forest owner or manager would choose to pay in order to be inspected.

Most forests are now certified, which means that forest owners themselves take responsibility for biodiversity.

We must give the forest owners an incentive not to chop down forests but to preserve them.

This is why I think that forest owners should be given a direct payment per area.