experimenter

The true test of an experimenter, he said, was his data.

This may be because he was not the most able experimenter.

The experimenter asked then what the audience thought they saw.

But they have a different psychological effect on the experimenter.

Children played a game against a second experimenter for chocolate.

The experimenters then placed food on one of the two arms.

Next, the experimenter asked the children to demonstrate what they had seen in the film.

After repeating the question, the experimenter turned to ask the subject.

No experimenter should ever allow himself to become involved with his experiment.

The experimenters later asked whether the question about their race affected them.

The subjects are read a list of associated words by the experimenter.

Six months later, the experimenters followed up with participants to check if they were still in the same relationship.

They were hard to understand, granted, but more interesting than the experimenters, like her John.

What exactly did the experimenters have to gain by such tests?

In addition environmental conditions can be controlled by the experimenter.

Worse yet, what did the experimenters plan to do with the information they were gathering?

But wasn't the goal of those 60's experimenters to make the world a better place?

One group was designated to be the subjects, the other experimenters.

This shows, better than any estimate in figures, how high the experimenter went.

Participants believed the experimenter was in control and held information he personally did not.

Other experimenters will repeat your experiment and find out whether you were wrong or right.

The experimenters were asked not to compare impressions until the test was over.

One of the pair was designated the subject and the other the experimenter.

The experimenter asked the appropriate question and checked that the subject was ready.

"States and cities have always been a major set of social experimenters.