The challenge is then how to non-represent empirical reality without reducing the complexity of a system.
There is no empirical reality outside articulations of meaning.
Note that the conflict begins with assumed priority not matching empirical reality.
If claims always match empirical reality, then there is no conflict.
Eliminating exclusion, claims to priority of access will always be based on empirical reality.
The motivation to establish priority of access will always be based on empirical reality.
Boundaries exist in empirical reality, because people and things obviously do not melt together upon touching.
Critics point out that this does not correspond to empirical reality.
Why then does the public fear of the mentally ill so far exceed empirical reality?
The empirical reality of time, therefore, remains, as the condition of all our experience.