You can talk about Chicago's lack of a dominant center.

I think Phoenix has shown that they may be a great team, but without a dominant center, you don't know.

With no dominant center, the stage was set for an unpredictable evening.

"Will New York be the dominant financial center in 1992?"

Chicago and Detroit have won the last five championships without a dominant center.

There have been a handful of championship teams without the dominant center.

Does Robinson feel dominant centers are less important than they used to be?

Whatever happened to the concept that it takes a dominant center or at least a quality one to win a championship?

I still hold to the theory that to win you need the dominant or quality center.

In Europe, a dominant center is not that much of an effect under current rules.