The commitment to democratic procedures came in a country that until 1985 was run as a military dictatorship.

There were no clear constitutional or democratic procedures for political succession.

A commitment was made to respect the will of the people and democratic procedures.

They agreed on the European rule of law and a new democratic procedure.

I think this shows that it is possible to have a democratic procedure which does not take an overly long time.

Unfortunately, we have to say that it has also been at the expense of our democratic procedures.

The way the elections were conducted had nothing to do with democratic procedures.

In short, here we have a simple, innovative, democratic procedure.

The second reason is that it makes the case for more democratic procedures.

The participants are not upset because they accept the democratic procedure.