The defendant states that Simon's conduct was so terrible that of all the Athenians, he alone was formally dismissed by the generals for misconduct.

The significance of plaintiffs' evidence on the concentration of poverty in the Hartford schools is, first, as defendants have officially stated, "those who need more must receive more."

One defendant stated that he was a husband and that someone else caused the out-of-wedlock birth, but he was convicted anyway.

The problem is largely ameliorated by amendments to the prescribed forms for giving notice of payment in which require the defendant to state the relevant deduction withheld.

The court then ordered a verdict for plaintiff, subject to its opinion, whether the facts proved were sufficient to render defendant liable to plaintiff on the cause of action stated.

The defendant stated that after the males placed the duffel bags in the trunk, they handed her the keys to the car so that she could begin her trip home.

The defendant further stated he went into the K-Mart store to steal videos.

The defendants all stated that the burglary was Liddy's own idea, and not authorized by CRP to whose funds he had access for "legitimate" purposes.

In order to invoke the rule against prior restraint, the defendant must state on affidavit his intention to justify the allegation.

After waiving those rights, the defendant stated, among other things, that he was standing in the bank near the embassy on the day of the bombing with a companion.