Instead, prosecutors must prove that each defendant intended to take part in a crime and did something to help make it happen.

In this situation, the defendant has actually done everything to break the law and intended to do it to avoid some threatened or actual harm.

To prove any case against Enron, prosecutors would have to establish that potential defendants intended to commit a crime.

Did the defendant intend to cause the resulting harm?

It is sufficient for the prosecutor to prove that the defendant intended to participate in an act of fighting.

It is then for the prosecutor to prove that the defendant did so intend or was aware.

The defendant must intend to carry out the act which constitutes trespass for it to be valid.

The making of a threat to kill is an offence where the defendant intends the victim to fear it will be carried out.

Prosecutors would not have to show that the defendant intended to cause the death or injury of the fetus.

The prosecution must show that the defendant provided assistance, and intended to assist the perpetrator.