One camp argues that because there has been no conclusive medical research, children should not be allowed to perform headers until more information is available.

A third camp argued that humanity simply wasn't bright enough, or advanced enough, to figure out what was being said.

One camp argues that American influence is marginal, the other that what the United States does matters a lot.

Each camp argues that its method of reaching the customer is superior.

With few true legal guideposts, each camp argued that the Constitution was on its side.

The two camps are also arguing over who owns the master's words.

One camp argues that this slowdown will not be easily halted by lower rates and tax cuts.

The first camp argues that disaster inevitably dissipates with time.

One camp argues that free Shakespeare isn't practical.

A dissident camp argues that pouring more water from the Everglades into the bay will only hasten the decline.