It is not what we'd call unequivocal evidence of anything.

"This must be what they call overwhelming circumstantial evidence," he said.

In legal trials, moreover, the defendant has a full right to call evidence on his behalf.

Then they won't have to call evidence at all, will they?

"I'd hardly call it evidence, but it's all in there."

We don't have one single thing that can remotely be called evidence.

He was not allowed to call witnesses or present certain evidence.

I'm not even sure you can call it evidence.

You know, those things that are proved by that thing called evidence?

The conspiracy theories have also been called evidence of "the need for a national debate on mental illness."