Though I reserve the right to change it back again, if a better theory comes along.

On the other hand technology also opens up new possibilities for monitoring and measurement which should support the development of better basic theory.

Couldn't you come up with a better theory?

To Art, it all suggested that a better theory was definitely overdue.

Do we need more data or better theory?

There will be another better theory of gravity in the future, for example.

Such corrections lead the way to better theories to explain the facts.

But on the other hand, he could not concoct a better theory to replace it.

This is about as far as empirical research can take us without better theories.

How we can distinguish a better theory from a worse one?