Arson is prosecuted with attention to degree of severity in the alleged offense.

(How serious the alleged offense need be is a matter of debate.)

But the question now is whether his alleged offense should be criminal at all.

I do not believe the issue here would be any different if the alleged offense had not involved speech.

Nor are committee members fazed by the notion of removing the President for his alleged offenses.

Of course, liberals could never manage to produce a tape of his alleged offense.

The petitioners were adults at the time of the alleged offense.

Under the act, the police have no obligation to disclose the alleged offense if any at all.

Even though all the alleged offenses occurred in Canada, Canadian police did not lay any charges.

He gave no details of the alleged offenses.