The above passage contains a falsehood in almost every line.

The above passage is worth bearing in mind.

I do not understand the reference in the above passage to section 10 of the Act of 1839.

The above passage is in the original typescript of Nova, however.

Paxton's remarks in the above passage seem to support this supposition.

The church mentioned in the above passage still stands and operates.

Reflecting on the above passage, for example, I wondered: What is surrogate experience?

The above passages may, however, be open to modern interpretation.

Critics have similarly tried to explain, even explain away, many of the above passages.

But the above passage constitutes, in my judgment, an approach to the exercise of discretion which cannot be faulted.