At first, White argued that it should begin on July 4, 2012, so that protesters would have time to prepare.

Thus, White argued that the recorded conversations should not have been admitted as evidence.

Protecting citizens' right to movement was a state function, White argued, and had to be enforced solely in state court.

White has also argued, however, that history is most successful when it embraces this "narrativity", since it is what allows history to be meaningful.

What Lyman "esteemed most," White argues, "was excellence and achievement."

White argued instead that the fur trade occupied part of a "middle ground" in which Europeans and Indians sought to accommodate their cultural differences.

Whites who oppose antidiscrimination measures often argue sincerely that they are not responsible for a past that is long gone.

Finally, White argued that the Solem test works well in practice.

White argues that what is important now is to determine trend-change points on the performance curve so that the most appropriate performance management actions can be applied.