Van Til argues that the problem is not evolution, but its misuse for "naturalistic apologetics".

However, it is this very feature that has caused some Christian apologists to reject Van Til's approach.

Van Til sought a third way from Kuyper and Warfield.

Van Til claims that non-Christian presuppositions reduce to absurdity and are self-defeating.

John Frame, a student of Van Til, has endorsed this objection.

"Once you get nonprofit status, it's yours forever," Van Til said.

"I think many times they want to project an image that they're important," Van Til said.

In general, Van Til's approach is far more popular and widespread than Clark's.

VanTil.info - writings by and about Van Til and his apologetic.

First Word - articles about Van Til's apologetic.