In 1928, The San Francisco Chronicle called him one of the city's most skilled painters.

The San Francisco Chronicle called the book a reflection "on the work of a larger-than-life persona."

The San Francisco Chronicle called the book "honest, reflective, and often uproariously funny,".

The San Francisco Chronicle called it a "dreadful teen comedy."

The San Francisco Chronicle called the game "the miniature golf of martial sports."

The San Francisco Chronicle calls the exhibition the most important show of a contemporary artist in 2004.

San Francisco Chronicle called it "an extravaganza of bad special effects and worse acting."

The San Francisco Chronicle calls it "poignant, incisive and enduring."

But the San Francisco Chronicle called it "a depressing muddle," and, "a person could get a headache trying to figure out" the film.

The San Francisco Chronicle called the said a "disaster on every level."