One stated that the "witless, gutless buggers wouldn't dare mock Islam", an observation later apparently vindicated when the magazine declined to publish the Danish Mohammed cartoons for fear of firebombs (although it does regularly publish Islam-related humour).

Special Prize of the Jury: Ralf König, for his cartoons and commitment to the conflict revolving around the Danish Mohammed cartoons.

In 2006 the Commentator republished the twelve Mohammed cartoons that had sparked riots across the Middle East after first appearing in the Danish newspaper Jyllands Posten several months prior.

The West proved itself incapable of being consistent on hate speech when it (and by that I mean the general consensus) defended the publication of the Mohammed cartoons on grounds that, even though they thought the cartoons were repulsive, offensive speech ought not to be censored.

"From the perspective of many Muslims the Mohammed cartoons (i.e. the expression of "our freedom" and "our way of life")"

The French newspaper Libération reprints the Mohammed cartoons anew, to highlight the start of a trial against another French newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, and in support of free speech.

Also, good to see that the Telegraph has the balls to print the Mohammed cartoon today.

Major Norwegian newspapers reprinted the Danish Mohammed cartoons only last year.

In February 2006, responding to the publication of the Mohammed cartoons, he accused the Danes of "spying" and being "pro-terrorist".

When the Philadelphia Inquirer published some of the cartoons of Mohammed in the 2005 Mohammed cartoons controversy, Bray said: "This has nothing to do with free speech; its pure sensationalism that reeks of religious disrespect.