Two possessions later, Miller was arguing a foul called on him that sent Houston to the line.

Miller argued that only a national standard for obscenity could be applied.

Weintraub and Miller argued against this placement (but see).

Miller argues that an obvious univocal reading in the conventional sense is a myth.

Miller was arguing with a man in a cap, demanding admission, by the look of it.

Miller also argued that forgoing the investments in question would decrease the value of the foundation's portfolio.

Congress could not be expected to explicitly give its consent to every single aspect of the proposed state constitution, Miller argued.

Miller argued that the city may soon have to face the choice of "an industrial or revitalized waterfront".

Miller argued that these were the only responsible steps that Toronto could take to prevent a financial crisis.

Miller argued that the new measures were essential to sustaining the city's budget, without reducing services or raising property taxes.