Lord Denning MR held that the more onerous the clause, the better notice of it needed to be given.

Lord Denning MR held that the decision was perverse and would be reversed.

Lord Denning MR held that there was no frustration of the contract.

Lord Denning MR said it was amazing that this case had gotten so far.

Lord Denning MR held that they were not entitled to compensation.

Lord Denning MR held that there could be no new easement.

Lord Denning MR held that there was a sufficient common intention for severance at £750.

Lord Denning MR set out the facts in his judgment.

However Lord Denning MR also put forward an alternative test.

Lord Denning MR's judgment ran on the law as follows.