Biologists, I claim, reject the Kantian view of mathematics as the measure of a true science, and rightly so.

Thus the Kantian view sees teleology as a necessary principle for the study of organisms, but only as a regulative principle, and with no ontological implications.

However Poincaré did not share Kantian views in all branches of philosophy and mathematics.

In this writing, and especially in the appendix, Jacobi came into contact with the critical philosophy, and subjected the Kantian view of knowledge to searching examination.

Bourdieu argued against Kantian view of pure aesthetics, stating that the legitimate taste of the society is the taste of the ruling class.

Within psychology, Patricia Cheng (1997) attempted to reconcile the Humean and Kantian views.

They have each argued against relativism, supporting the Kantian view that universality is essential to any viable moral philosophy.

According to the Kantian view, ontological arguments are those which are founded on a priori reasoning.

This is close to the Kantian view that reality is ultimately unknowable and all models are just imperfect approximations to it.

On the other hand, some people would readily assume that Einstein's findings in Physics support the Kantian view of space and time.