Her reliance on "everything he said to me" must, therefore, reflect her own plan to implement discussions the two had had about concealing the relationship long before her role in the Jones litigation.

There is substantial and credible information that the President assisted Ms. Lewinsky in her job search motivated at least in part by his desire to keep her "on the team" in the Jones litigation.

I have yet to hear from the managers a single plausible explanation for the inclusion of this charge as part of a scheme to obstruct the Jones litigation, and I can think of none.

One sharply disputed issue in the Jones litigation was the extent to which the President would be required to disclose information about sexual relationships he may have had with "other women."

As the investigation into the President's actions with respect to Ms. Lewinsky and the Jones litigation progressed, it became apparent that there was a significant body of substantial and credible information that met the Section 595(c) threshold.

The position that nothing the President or his advisers could say to each other regarding the grand jury investigation or the Jones litigation would relate to the President's official duties is oversimplified.

The Appendix contains relevant court orders, tables, a discussion of legal and evidentiary issues, background information on the Jones litigation, a diagram of the Oval Office, and other reference material.

Look at Article II, which by its terms charges obstruction of the Jones litigation.

It presents six topics related to the Jones litigation and one related to the very separate issue of grand jury obstruction.

Mr. Starr is also investigating possible subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice and other Federal crimes in connection with the Jones litigation.