writ of error

There is no reason why the writ of error should be confined to civil cases.

This writ of error was brought to review that judgment.

The defendant brought a writ of error to reverse it.

The government then brought a writ of error; but meanwhile Drake had died.

There was a writ of error to the Supreme Court.

Judgment below for plaintiff, to reverse which this writ of error was brought.

This request for judicial review, upon writ of error, was denied.

By the present writ of error, the plaintiff brings that judgment under review.

After More, no writs of error issued from federal criminal trials in the circuit courts for 84 years.

Phoenix issued a Writ of Error to appeal the original decision.

A motion was made to dismiss the writ of error in this case on the following grounds:

The plaintiffs sued out this writ of error.

The writ of error in this case was brought five days after the two years allowed by law had expired and was thus dismissed.

The plaintiff appealed to the general term, which affirmed the judgment, and he brought the case here by a writ of error.

This the two judges refused to do, the matter not coming before the house on writ of error from the King's Bench.

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee then came forward under a writ of error.

Texaco's filing of an "application for a writ of error" with the state's highest court was expected.

The Court could review criminal convictions from the state courts, but not the lower federal courts, via writs of error.

But, these statutory grants were construed not to permit writs of error filed by the prosecution, as in More.

To reverse that judgment of affirmance, the plaintiffs brought this writ of error.

Collet obtained a writ of error but dropped the case before reaching the Supreme Court.

The case was brought to the Supreme Court on certiorari, and also on writ of error.

Any case could be appealed to the United States Supreme Court on a writ of error.

Appeal to the courts of appeals by writs of error was provided for all "final decisions," in civil and criminal cases alike.

Without reported discussion of the jurisdictional issue, the Court did hear writs of error from criminal cases removed to the circuit courts.