taxon

It is the sister taxon to the rest of its family.

However, they are not the only fish taxon called by this name.

This taxon has not been reported until 2005 after the type collection.

He has elevated this taxon to specific level in 1903.

There are about 30,000 species that were included in this taxon.

Separation from the sister taxon happened about 15 million years ago.

Although they were first discovered in 1883, a common name does not exist for the taxon.

In this case of one taxon, remains are reasonably well known.

There are currently about 260 named species in this taxon.

Most authors now recognize this group as its own taxon.

It just happens to be the name chosen, based on an included taxon.

Alex George also reports that the taxon should be reviewed.

Although only formally described in 2010, this taxon was already known several years earlier.

This taxon may also refer to other species; see below.

This is the principle that the name of each taxon must be unique.

It appears to be unrelated to other known members of this taxon.

The group may even be something of a "wastebasket taxon".

Thus it could be used even today (for a taxon above the rank of family).

It is a form taxon known only from fossil pollen.

A botanical name is fixed to a taxon by a type.

It is thought that this population may constitute a separate taxon.

Description The author(s) associated with the name of a taxon.

The taxon has two genera with a total of six species.

Over the years, the species of this taxon have been reassessed.

See also below for a common misapplication of this taxon.