tactical voting

The potential for tactical voting also came in for question.

Since at least 1991, tactical voting has been an important feature of the nominating process.

The potential for tactical voting in a single non-transferable vote system is large.

All three main parties can claim to be in with a good chance if tactical voting breaks their way.

Right now and for some time you should be advocating tactical voting .

It later transpired that he had been the victim of tactical voting.

Tactical voting against the Conservatives is believed to have caused around 40 seats to change hands.

Some people view tactical voting as providing misleading information.

Many experts question tactical voting in that it can undermine a democratic outcome.

One high-profile example of tactical voting was the California gubernatorial election, 2002.

However the exhaustive ballot is still vulnerable to tactical voting under some circumstances.

Such tactical voting would be less effective if the ballots were counted using median scores.

Tactical voting is highly dependent on the voting system being used.

But he could be the victim of tactical voting, especially in a constituency where there were many complaints about the poll tax.

This resulted in tactical voting against the Conservatives across Scotland.

There is something demoralising about such crude tactical voting.

Tactical voting by compromising is exceedingly common in plurality elections.

Examples should strive to demonstrate possibilities for tactical voting, to be explained in the section below.

But the evidence for tactical voting is patchy.

Puerto Rico's 2004 elections were affected by tactical voting.

Along with tactical voting, the other hot topic of political speculation here is the timing of the next national election.

Most researchers tend to frown on tactical voting.

This is an example of tactical voting.

Tactical voting - Voters in countries such as Germany may cast two votes and they need not be for the same party.

Tactical voting on something as important as our voting system is absurd.