strategic dominance

Strategic dominance links the Monty Hall problem to the game theory.

Strategic dominance, a method of simplification for games.

In the 1970s, the United States concluded that cruise missiles are a very cost effective means of achieving strategic dominance.

"China is pursuing a national strategy of domination of the energy markets and strategic dominance of the western Pacific."

That means coping with Russia's and China's anxieties that Washington has embarked on a quest for strategic dominance.

In a two-player game, an admissible decision rule for a player is one that does not use any strategy that is weakly dominated by another (see Strategic dominance).

On the east site, the brow of the hill has also been flattened to allow houses to be built and therefore the strategic dominance of the location harder to visualise.

Japanese nationalism was buoyed by a romantic concept of Bushidō and driven by a modern concern for rapid industrial development and strategic dominance in East Asia.

James P. Wade, Jr. is the author, with Harlan K. Ullman of the doctrine of strategic dominance, more popularly known as Shock and awe.

In recent interviews Mr. Gorbachev has been critical of Pentagon strategists who have asserted that the United States should be committed to policies of strategic dominance in the post-Communist world.

A public pledge to slash the number of nuclear arms, officials understood, would help make the case to the Russians, as well as to other Europeans, that the administration's plan to build a missile defense was not part of a drive for strategic dominance.

During the regency of Prince-Regent Luitpold relations between Bavarians and Prussians remained cold with Bavarians remembering the anti-Catholic agenda of Bismarck's Kulturkampf as well as Prussia's strategic dominance over the empire.

The Theory of Communicative Action associated with Jürgen Habermas emphasizes the essential role of language in public life, suggesting that alienation stems from the distortion of reasoned moral debate by the strategic dominance of market forces and state power.

But when Germany and its European partners try to coordinate that defense spending, develop their own military identity within NATO through the formation of a 60,000 strong rapid-reaction corps, and generally sketch a partial emancipation from American strategic dominance, Washington gets uneasy.