They also opened a gulf between richer and poorer members.

The party relies on members' subscription and donations from rich members.

Saying that it will only benefit the richest members of society is really pushing it.

That is, you can make a case that our society would be richer if its richest members didn't get quite so much.

Thanks to that, she lost all her money - 9100€ - and went from the richest member in the house to the poorest.

More radically, they want automatic subsidies from rich members for poor ones.

On the contrary, the peasants supported the richer members of society who stood to lose by the suggested reforms.

They offered to give up some of their own aid from the union so that the older and richer members could keep theirs.

It appears that they lived on funds provided by the richer members.

She's also referred publicly to some of our richer members as parasites.